© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Some of the artwork details are seen on a large scale sample of the new twenty pound note during the launch event at the Turner Contemporary gallery in Margate, Britain, October 10, 2019. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS By Huw Jones LONDON (Reuters) -Many fund managers fall short in assessing the value
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Some of the artwork details are seen on a large scale sample of the new twenty pound note during the launch event at the Turner Contemporary gallery in Margate, Britain, October 10, 2019. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS
By Huw Jones
LONDON (Reuters) -Many fund managers fall short in assessing the value of their funds and regulatory action may be needed, Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority said on Tuesday as part of a longstanding crackdown on unjustified fees.
A review of 18 fund managers between July 2020 and May 2021 found most had not implemented FCA standards on assessments of value, the watchdog said in a statement.
An assessment is required at least once a year and is key in determining whether fees charged by funds are justified.
While some funds conducted their assessments well, too many often made assumptions that they could not justify to the regulator, the FCA said.
“When considering a fund’s performance, many firms did not consider what the fund should deliver given its investment policy, investment strategy and fees,” the FCA said.
“Firms spent a disproportionate amount of time looking for savings in administration service charges that cost investors relatively little compared with the time spent reviewing the costs of asset management and distribution that typically cost investors much more.”
The Investment Association, which represents asset managers in Britain, said it will continue to work with firms as they improve their processes for performing and reporting value assessments.
Some firms said their underperformance relative to a benchmark over some years was due to the manager’s style of investing, but still told investors they were getting value for money, the FCA said.
Some of the independent directors on the governing bodies of funds failed to provide the “robust challenge we expect” and appeared to lack sufficient understanding of relevant fund rules, the FCA said.
The FCA said it will review firms again within the next 12 to 18 months to assess how well they have responded to Tuesday’s feedback.
“We will consider other regulatory tools should we find firms are not meeting the standards we expect to be necessary to comply with our rules.”
David Croker, asset management risk and regulation partner at PwC, said the FCA message was stark and will be a “wake-up” call for some fund board members as firms “only have one more cycle of value assessments to get it right”.
Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.